Electrical Engineering
      and Computer Sciences

Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences

COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

UC Berkeley

Dynamics of Simultaneous Overlay Network Routing

Mukund Seshadri and Randy H. Katz

EECS Department
University of California, Berkeley
Technical Report No. UCB/CSD-03-1291
November 2003

http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2003/CSD-03-1291.pdf

Peer-to-peer and overlay networks allow routing to be controlled at the application layer. Consider several independent overlay flows, each with a set of available overlay routes to send their data on. If they each select the route with the most available bandwidth, i.e., they are "greedy", a significant degree of instability could result, leading to degraded performance. We investigate this possibility, and a wide variety of factors that affect routing performance, by simulations. We find that some measure of "restraint" is crucial for obtaining acceptable performance of route selection in such scenarios. Specifically, we investigate three forms of restraint -- randomization of route selection, utilizing an appropriate hysteresis threshold when switching routes, and increasing the time intervals between route-change considerations.

Our results indicate that randomization can significantly reduce loss-rates (typically by half) -- more importantly, it is sufficient to utilize load information from a small subset of overlay paths to obtain such results. This approach would significantly reduce the path measurement overhead imposed by applications. Secondly, we find that appropriate values of the hysteresis threshold (H) can be heavily dependent on the parameters of the system. Therefore we propose that flows determine H dynamically; we suggest and evaluate an algorithm based on multiplicative increase and decrease of H for this purpose. This algorithm is found to reduce loss rates of the basic greedy method by at least half. Finally, we investigate the scenario when a subset of unrestrained overlay flows (the "cheaters") select the best of all available routes, while the remainder use suitable hysteresis thresholds or randomization.


BibTeX citation:

@techreport{Seshadri:CSD-03-1291,
    Author = {Seshadri, Mukund and Katz, Randy H.},
    Title = {Dynamics of Simultaneous Overlay Network Routing},
    Institution = {EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley},
    Year = {2003},
    Month = {Nov},
    URL = {http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2003/5298.html},
    Number = {UCB/CSD-03-1291},
    Abstract = {Peer-to-peer and overlay networks allow routing to be controlled at the application layer. Consider several independent overlay flows, each with a set of available overlay routes to send their data on. If they each select the route with the most available bandwidth, i.e., they are "greedy", a significant degree of instability could result, leading to degraded performance. We investigate this possibility, and a wide variety of factors that affect routing performance, by simulations. We find that some measure of "restraint" is crucial for obtaining acceptable performance of route selection in such scenarios. Specifically, we investigate three forms of restraint -- randomization of route selection, utilizing an appropriate hysteresis threshold when switching routes, and increasing the time intervals between route-change considerations. <p>Our results indicate that randomization can significantly reduce loss-rates (typically by half) -- more importantly, it is sufficient to utilize load information from a small subset of overlay paths to obtain such results. This approach would significantly reduce the path measurement overhead imposed by applications. Secondly, we find that appropriate values of the hysteresis threshold (<i>H</i>) can be heavily dependent on the parameters of the system. Therefore we propose that flows determine <i>H</i> dynamically; we suggest and evaluate an algorithm based on multiplicative increase and decrease of <i>H</i> for this purpose. This algorithm is found to reduce loss rates of the basic greedy method by at least half. Finally, we investigate the scenario when a subset of unrestrained overlay flows (the "cheaters") select the best of all available routes, while the remainder use suitable hysteresis thresholds or randomization.}
}

EndNote citation:

%0 Report
%A Seshadri, Mukund
%A Katz, Randy H.
%T Dynamics of Simultaneous Overlay Network Routing
%I EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley
%D 2003
%@ UCB/CSD-03-1291
%U http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2003/5298.html
%F Seshadri:CSD-03-1291