Electrical Engineering
      and Computer Sciences

Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences

COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

UC Berkeley

Implicit Coscheduling: Coordinated Scheduling with Implicit Information in Distributed Systems

Andrea Carol Arpaci-Dusseau

EECS Department
University of California, Berkeley
Technical Report No. UCB/CSD-99-1052
December 1998

http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/1999/CSD-99-1052.pdf

In this thesis, we formalize the concept of an implicitly-controlled system, also referred to as an implicit system. In an implicit system, cooperating components do not explicitly contact other components for control or state information; instead, components infer remote state by observing naturally-occurring local events and their corresponding implicit information, i.e., information available outside of a defined interface. Many systems, particularly in distributed and networked environments, have leveraged implicit control to simplify the implementation of services with autonomous components.

To concretely demonstrate the advantages of implicit control, we propose and implement implicit coscheduling, an algorithm for dynamically coordinating the time-sharing of communicating processes across distributed machines. Coordinated scheduling, required for communicating processes to leverage the recent performance improvements of switch-based networks and low overhead protocols, has traditionally been achieved with explicit coscheduling. However, implementations of explicit coscheduling often suffer from multiple failure points, high context-switch overheads, and poor interaction with client-server, interactive, and I/O-intensive jobs.

Implicit coscheduling supports not only traditional parallel applications on Networks of Workstations, but also general-purpose workloads. By observing and reacting to implicit information (e.g., the round-trip time of request-response messages), processes across the system make independent decisions that coordinate their scheduling in a fair and efficient manner. The principle component of implicit coscheduling is conditional two-phase waiting, a generalization of traditional two-phase waiting in which spin-time is only partially determined before the process begins waiting and may be conditionally increased depending upon events that occur while the process spins. A second important component is a fair and preemptive local operating system scheduler.

With simple models and analysis, we derive the appropriate baseline and conditional spin amounts for the waiting algorithm as a function of system parameters. We show through simulation and an implementation on a cluster of 32 workstations that implicit coscheduling efficiently and fairly handles competing applications with a wide range of communication characteristics. We predict that most well-behaved parallel applications will perform within 15% of ideal explicit coscheduling.

Advisor: David E. Culler


BibTeX citation:

@phdthesis{Arpaci-Dusseau:CSD-99-1052,
    Author = {Arpaci-Dusseau, Andrea Carol},
    Title = {Implicit Coscheduling: Coordinated Scheduling with Implicit Information in Distributed Systems},
    School = {EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley},
    Year = {1998},
    Month = {Dec},
    URL = {http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/1998/5519.html},
    Number = {UCB/CSD-99-1052},
    Abstract = {In this thesis, we formalize the concept of an implicitly-controlled system, also referred to as an implicit system. In an implicit system, cooperating components do not explicitly contact other components for control or state information; instead, components infer remote state by observing naturally-occurring local events and their corresponding implicit information, i.e., information available outside of a defined interface. Many systems, particularly in distributed and networked environments, have leveraged implicit control to simplify the implementation of services with autonomous components. <p>To concretely demonstrate the advantages of implicit control, we propose and implement implicit coscheduling, an algorithm for dynamically coordinating the time-sharing of communicating processes across distributed machines. Coordinated scheduling, required for communicating processes to leverage the recent performance improvements of switch-based networks and low overhead protocols, has traditionally been achieved with explicit coscheduling. However, implementations of explicit coscheduling often suffer from multiple failure points, high context-switch overheads, and poor interaction with client-server, interactive, and I/O-intensive jobs. <p>Implicit coscheduling supports not only traditional parallel applications on Networks of Workstations, but also general-purpose workloads. By observing and reacting to implicit information (e.g., the round-trip time of request-response messages), processes across the system make independent decisions that coordinate their scheduling in a fair and efficient manner. The principle component of implicit coscheduling is conditional two-phase waiting, a generalization of traditional two-phase waiting in which spin-time is only partially determined before the process begins waiting and may be conditionally increased depending upon events that occur while the process spins. A second important component is a fair and preemptive local operating system scheduler. <p>With simple models and analysis, we derive the appropriate baseline and conditional spin amounts for the waiting algorithm as a function of system parameters. We show through simulation and an implementation on a cluster of 32 workstations that implicit coscheduling efficiently and fairly handles competing applications with a wide range of communication characteristics. We predict that most well-behaved parallel applications will perform within 15% of ideal explicit coscheduling.}
}

EndNote citation:

%0 Thesis
%A Arpaci-Dusseau, Andrea Carol
%T Implicit Coscheduling: Coordinated Scheduling with Implicit Information in Distributed Systems
%I EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley
%D 1998
%@ UCB/CSD-99-1052
%U http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/1998/5519.html
%F Arpaci-Dusseau:CSD-99-1052